Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
See US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:32 am
JAC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
New State Law Prohibits Discrimination Based On Military Status Posted on January 18, 2008 by Rob Stalter On December 20, 2007, Governor Strickland signed into law the “Ohio Veterans Package” (Sub. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Justice Strickland, in 0871768 B.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
Moore and State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Strickland Issue: Whether a racial minority group that constitutes less than 50% of a proposed district's population can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Department of State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
” Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Yesterday’s transcript in Betterman v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
