Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
If you're poor and not yet convicted, you may get the benefit of a Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:28 pm
Yesterday, in Holland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473-74 (2007).Few state court judgments can withstand even one such error, see, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
State, 358 So. 2d 401, 403 (Miss.1978) In Roland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
State (a published opinion) focused on the 2nd prong of the Supreme Court's ineffective assistance standard as laid out in Strickland - whether Appellant was prejudiced by his counsel's performance. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:51 am
In his petition for cert, petr attacks the standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:12 pm
In a case involving prisoners’ rights, for example, Kagan criticized a 1984 Supreme Court decision–Strickland v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
State, 2010 Fla. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:41 pm
The standard of review for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel is set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:04 pm
Under the test set forth by Strickland v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Strickland, 2010 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:10 am
State v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm
” State v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm
Connecticut, of course, also treats sex offender registration as regulatory rather than a punitive measure (State v. [read post]
