Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 16,406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm
Cal.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
In these cases—Elrod v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
., tons of delay, even though the government theoretically has a strong interest in getting these cases resolved expeditiously. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”Citing the State’s “strong public policy” that disputes be heard “on the merits,” and given that she had demonstrated the existence of a “potentially meritorious defense” to the litigation, the AT1 thought that the court below had “providently exercised its discretion,” and left the outcome undisturbed.Apparently, the complaint made reference to unpaid rent due under a residential lease that had expired back on May 31,… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
” Our strong presumption flows from copyright law’s asymmetric recoveries. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
Eastern District of North Carolina Judge Richard Myers in Nutt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
(I put that aside because I don’t think state-court judges that represent the people of a single state should be able to remove candidates for national office under a provision of the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
The nonprofit loses, though, because the state has a strong interest in preventing fraud. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Leytrick v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
” This tops my chart as one of the strong languages used by a conflict of laws’ academic to disagree with another academic. [read post]
