Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
So, plaintiff sued former attorney for malpractice and violation of the consumer protection act. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act: Like the old California regime, the CPPA enables private individuals to act as “private attorney[s] general” in enforcing consumer protection laws. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is seeking feedback on the draft guidance for research provisions of the UK General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
The best democracy (either liberal democratic or Marxist-Leninist), the optimum consumer, the ideal worker or administrator, the best approach to sensible sustainability based decision making is that can be both predicted and managed ( see e.g., here). [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Miami Herald v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
Second, Rogers does not impose a materiality requirement, and it is hard to see how the government has a compelling interest in protecting consumers from confusion they don’t care about. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Legally: Falwell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am
Apple More Evidence That IP Law Protects Individual Emoji Depictions–Nirvana v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
However, they didn’t give up! [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 11:42 am
The ROSS v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:31 pm
Patane v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
Commenting on the charges, newly confirmed CPSC Chair Alex Hoehn-Saric stated, “[t]his historic criminal enforcement action should serve notice that the CPSC will use its authority to the fullest to keep American families safe. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:19 pm
Yet, in the antitrust case Epic Games v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:09 pm
Champion v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:07 am
” Ultimately, if companies don’t meet the January 1, 2023, deadline, the California Privacy Protection Agency can impose penalties of up to $7,500 per violation if children are involved or up to $2,500 per violation if children are not involved. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
This isn’t surprising. [read post]
