Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 661 - 680 of 1,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 8:30 pm by Kristin Bergman
California, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, and more have followed suit. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am by Allan Blutstein
If the Supreme Court takes up the issue, we know how Justice Kavanaugh will rule: he was in the majority. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm by Steve Kalar
It can be in the Ninth, thanks to a very disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
"It shouldn't take a cum laude law degree to figure that out.Marc J. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am by Robert Chesney
  According to the complaint, she discovered in 2005 while attempting to fly from California to Malaysia that she was on a no-fly list. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Subsection (e)(11) defines ‘loss’ as `any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service[.] [read post]