Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Italy is a large market, so if Nokia won one or more cases there, it would gain some additional leverage to whatever it may achieve in the U.S. and Germany -- unless HTC elects to take a license in the meantime, of course, which is the inevitable outcome.So far I've found out about two Nokia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:56 am
Last week, a state court judge in Orange County, California, declared the end of a landmark lawsuit called Campbell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling Hurst v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
The first is Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
California, 384 U. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court will take it up. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:05 am
The California Supreme Court saw it differently. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
Code, sections 65590, 65590.1) and the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
In Delfino v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Loss amount was properly calculated to include dollar amounts that she had not yet withdrawn, and her base offense level was properly increased where the physical act of popping small air bubbles on the laminated face of her fake ID constituted production of a counterfeit access device. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
February: EFF published an explosive report on how the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC) treats posting to social media as an offense on par with hostage-taking, rioting, rape, and escape. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 2:39 am
Adams v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:02 pm
Will a principal get angry when he sees himself ridiculed, and thus take action against a student? [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
He began his ruling by noting that under Rule 29, a must enter a judgment of acquittal`of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm
Lee v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:35 pm
The law does not require, however, that a defendant take the cheap way out, as illustrated by Scott Smith, Pl., v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
However, later in the stop, Appellant stated that he had just started a new job in Illinois before he left to go to California, but he was allowed to take a month off because business was slow. [read post]
