Search for: "The Java"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 2:54 am
While I liked Apple's rather expressive, verbose function and variable names, I really found Objective-C awkward and have for some time preferred the Java/.NET-style managed code approach (Objective-C seemed to me like semi-managed at best). [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:26 pm
It will no longer use Java and will be viewable in browsers such as Chrome, Firefox and Safari.Justis.com:Over the next few months, this British company will launch a new research platform that will combine its citator product JustCite with a vastly expanded collection of full-text caselaw including unreported judgments. [read post]
23 May 2014, 12:27 pm
According to Oracle, Google wrote its own version of the JAVA language for Android but, to make it so that existing JAVA applications would work in Android without too much effort, copied the application programming interfaces (APIs), which are the instructions by which programs interact with the language. [read post]
19 May 2014, 8:39 am
In fact, Oracle offers three different licenses to those who want to make use of the Java API code. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am
US, Court of Federal Claims 2014http://t.co/r06p79IIgx -> In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable http://t.co/F1VKA9vGmU -> Plaintiff Maligns Deal in Silicon Valley Suit http://t.co/AN5mLzWvJI -> It’s Time To Combat Piracy In A Big Way http://t.co/9k5uUKkjF5 -> International publishers warn of 'severe' risk on copyright http://t.co/vwVEDNfJfL -> Much Ado About Copyright's 'Making… [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:41 pm
With Java, a programmer could “write once, run anywhere. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:27 am
Google after appellate ruling: this copyright case is NOT about $1 billion — FOSS Patents takes a look at some of the details from last week’s important Federal Circuit decision holding Google liable for infringing Oracle’s Java platform. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am
I’m not a big fan of its need for Java but we have that in our environment already so it’s not an added burden. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Oracle once stated its intent to "bring Android back into the Java fold" by making Google comply with the Java rules the rest of the industry has accepted. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:30 pm
Perhaps Judge O’Malley was worried that if she did not extend copyright protection to the Java APIs in Oracle v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 5:30 am
US, Court of Federal Claims 2014http://t.co/r06p79IIgx -> In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable http://t.co/F1VKA9vGmU -> [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am
So Google began to develop its own virtual machine to interact with the Java platform. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:30 am
Ontario (Finance), 2014 SCC 36 http://t.co/3ZJUyThDB5 -> Canada is passing a brutal anti-spam law http://t.co/8pEqz5Mgxv -> U.S. judge orders RBS unit stop using software in copyright case http://t.co/kUhXlFzrLm -> Anti-Piracy Law Boosted Music Sales , Plunged Internet Traffic http://t.co/ezwXOqE0p8 -> UK government may be underestimating 'economic impact' of copyright reforms on creators, warns Peers http://t.co/dLtWUPnYbd -> Oracle wins Android-Java copyright… [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:33 pm
[PDF 342kB], in which it overturned the earlier ruling by District Judge William Alsup that Oracle's Java API declaring code was not protected by copyright. [read post]
10 May 2014, 11:46 am
The litigation arose four year ago when Oracle sued Google, alleging its Android operating system infringes on patents and copyrights related to Oracle's Java technology. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released an important decision yesterday in the ongoing battle between Oracle and Google over copyright protection for the Java APIs Goolge used in developing Android. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:51 am
This was because there is only one way to write the Java method declarations and remain “interoperable” with Java; and the organisation and structure of the 37 Java API packages is a “command structure” excluded from copyright protection under Section 102(b) of the US Copyright Act.Of course, both parties appealed. [read post]
10 May 2014, 5:30 am
Ontario (Finance), 2014 SCC 36 http://t.co/3ZJUyThDB5 -> Canada is passing a brutal anti-spam law http://t.co/8pEqz5Mgxv -> U.S. judge orders RBS unit stop using software in copyright case http://t.co/kUhXlFzrLm -> Anti-Piracy Law Boosted Music Sales , Plunged Internet Traffic http://t.co/ezwXOqE0p8 -> UK government may be underestimating 'economic impact' of copyright reforms on creators, warns Peers http://t.co/dLtWUPnYbd -> Oracle wins Android-Java copyright… [read post]
10 May 2014, 3:47 am
District Judge William Alsup ruled that the Java APIs replicated by Google were not subject to copyright protection and were free for Google to use although the Judge said "This order does not hold that Java API packages are free for all to use without license" adding "It does not hold that the structure, sequence, and organization of all computer programs may be stolen. [read post]
In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable
10 May 2014, 12:23 am
Maybe all three circuit judges should have said at the hearing that they learned Java for this case. [read post]
