Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Edwards" Results 661 - 680 of 1,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
The following are some of the highlights: California:  Many people thought noncompetes were DOA with the California Supreme Court’s 2008 Edwards v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
LSE’s Professor Lee Edwards analyses how media literacy is presented in the draft Online Safety Bill, and suggests how the Bill’s proposals could be strengthened, for the LSE Media Policy Project. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:15 am
Currently,executions are stalled altogether, as states await a ruling in thelandmark Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
As we've discussed (and even polled you about), reasonable people can differ about who was to blame for the oath-of-office snafu. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 pm by David Kravets
This third-party doctrine dates to a 1979 Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:24 am by Russell Beck
In particular, while in many states, this would be a relatively straight-forward case for PayPal, in California, which has a strong public policy favoring employee mobility and the right to work, it will be a rare test of how the California courts balance these two important policies – especially following the California Supreme Court’s 2008 seminal case on restrictive covenants such as the anti-piracy agreement involved here (Edwards v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Related Web Resources: Fund Suits May Be Allowed by Supreme Court, Bloomberg.com, November 26, 2007 James LaRue v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Courtney Rachel Baron, An Eye for an Eye Leaves Everyone Blind: Fields v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 pm
"New York appellate court upholds Atlantic Yards taking - Goldstein v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:58 am by Nathan Koppel
  Secondly, they point to the fact that states have a duty, enshrined in Gideon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  California’s solicitor general, Edward C. [read post]