Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 661 - 680 of 49,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
Bates Distinguished Chair in Law and Director of the Institute for Higher Education, Law, and Governance at the University of Houston Law Center. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
”Not good.I understand that people who go to law school and become lawyers are often not exactly known for their placid temperament. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:56 am by Lawrence Solum
Decorum required that people not use the word “liar,” but it was implied clearly enough. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
  Finding only his children and his sister-in-law still at the house, he orders them to leave, and they do so. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
This case might make a good student law review article.Defendant exercises his right to represent himself at his first criminal trial and makes various statements during closing argument that, let's say, are less than well-advised (e.g., are incriminating). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:29 pm
But this opinion allows us to at least play one of our favorite games (and a reminder of law school exams): Fill in the blank.How do you think this one comes out: "Two versions of the facts were presented at trial: one told by the deputies who arrested defendant, and the other told by defendant. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am by Nick Reo
Several of the papers in this series will be of interest to Turtle Talk readers, including a unique analysis of Lyng v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
Justice Raye says in this case:  "[I]n the law of burglary what seems plausible often is not." [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
 Did the prosecutor mess things up by misstating the law during closing? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm
They were apprehended by law enforcement before they could enter the dealer’s home. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
  Fortunately, all that happened was that appellant was arrested and placed on probation.It's also a neat little appeal because it's one that's basically based on a law review article:  Northrop & Rosen's piece entitled “Kids Will be Kids: Time for a ‘Reasonable Child’ Standard for the Proof of Objective Mens Rea Elements. [read post]