Search for: "The People v. Baker"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 11:37 am
It basically argues that Oracle should have lost based on Baker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Its name is Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609 and it's a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sedley LJ, Rimer LJ and Sir Scott Baker) last Wednesday, 2 June.Asda (the British embodiment of Walmart) sold its own health food products, some of which were labelled with appealing little phrases like "No hidden nasties" and "No artificial colours or flavours and no aspartame". [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
And, in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
And then the DOJ took a heel turn in Zarda v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:24 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:47 pm
Baker says the difference is the product - speech v. nonspeech. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
Jones also credited the argument that Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:08 am
Late last year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:35 am
” Frontiero v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:47 am
Baker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm
Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Speakers are Ben Allgrove, a partner in the London office of Baker & McKenzie LLP which is kindly hosting the event, and JIPLP editorial board member Gert Wuertenberger (Wuertenberger Kunze, Munich). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
and the speakers are the all-too-infrequent IP Finance blogger Anne Fairpo (13 Old Square) and Kevin Phillips (no relation to this blogger) of Baker Tilly. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
On the first of this month, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a useful decision, People v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:26 am
Elderly people want to be independent and value their freedom. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
