Search for: "The People v. Jones" Results 661 - 680 of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While a court may possess the discretion to permit such an examination under appropriate circumstances, the defendant failed to demonstrate that such circumstances were present here akin to the cases of People v Earel and Peole v Jones. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:16 am by James Bickford
 At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Ashby Jones wonders whether Newdow has “a prayer. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
People are not stupid. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
People are not stupid. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
And certainly the defendant has a constitutional right to confront his or her accusers; I would say that the state has the equal right to make sure the people who are rebutting their potential case are confronted directly in court as well. . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Jones that people can expect information about their movements over an extended period of time, even on public streets, remain private. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Costello is an associate resident in the Atlanta office of Jones Day. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]