Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
This ruling marks the first time that a state court judge has struck down marriage laws based on the U. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Trademark law recognizes that there are many ways to use another’s mark without misleading consumers or infringing the owner’s rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Muller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Turner, Special Agent in Charge (SAC) of the FBI’s Norfolk Field Office; and Mark Russ, Special Agent in Charge of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) in Norfolk, made the announcement after the superseding indictment was returned. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:04 am
The Family [Court] Act identifies, as one of the primary obligations of the attorney for the child, helping the child articulate his or her position to the court” (Matter of Mark T. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:50 pm
See Dawn Donut Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am
” Kristina Davis of U-T San Diego reports on the effect that the Court’s recent decision in Riley v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
S. 312, 318 (1981) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
The case – Argus Leader Media v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:46 am
The case – Argus Leader Media v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Tomasovic, Brian S. and Stephen V. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” [13 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
" (Matter of Charles S., 60 AD3d 954, 955 [2d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].) [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
City Accommodations Network, Inc. a/k/a U. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
COUNSEL Mark Martel, for Plaintiff and Appellant Office of the City Attorney, Gary M. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
Justice Roberts cited the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
