Search for: "U. S. v. Parente"
Results 661 - 680
of 751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
We also accept that “it isnot an essential precondition” that the applicant’s legal representatives willnot continue to act unless the cost [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
For example, Royal Dutch Shell settled with the family of Ken Saro-Wiwa, a critic of Shell who was hanged by the country’s military regime in response to his protest against the company’s environmental practices, and other plaintiffs, but denied any wrongdoing.[6] The company stated that it “will provide funding for the trust and a compassionate payment to the plaintiffs and the estates they represent in recognition of the tragic turn of events in Ogoni land, even… [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Supreme Court in Shaffer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
DYFS has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination of parental rights will not do more harm than good. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
In Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 6:35 pm
Marcia T., Matter of, v Raymond W., 2009 NY Slip Op 51883(U). [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Under Sherbert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:44 am
Capistrano Unified Sch Dist 538 F.3d 1261, 50 IDELR 181 (9th Cir. 8/19/2008), the Ninth Circuit held that the school district violated state law by limiting the time that a psychologist could observe the student's placement to 20 minute increments, the parents were not thereby deprived of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the IEP review process. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
"We can accomplish more in terms of protecting children and keeping children safe by empowering parents and providing them with good information," he said. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:08 am
Although the U. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
S. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:13 am
On the facts of the case, the Revenue's burden was held to be not discharged. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:25 am
Por otra parte, resulta ocioso señalar que la edad de inicio en el uso de Internet comienza a los diez u once años de edad. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
See also Kolstad v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
As in Parents Involved, the Gang of 5 choose to ignore the Nation;s history of discrimination. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
In this case, political activists created and distributed free of charge a satire of the Vancouver Sun newspaper in an attempt to draw attention to the alleged editorial bias of the Sun's parent company, Canwest Mediaworks. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
Supreme Court decided by a 6 to 3 margin yesterday in favor of the parents in the case of Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:12 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Forest Grove v. [read post]
