Search for: "U.S. v. Parker*"
Results 661 - 680
of 912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 5:24 am
That does not mean they have the right to seize the gun in the bedroom, though.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:00 am
The judge cited Liteky v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:10 pm
“You Will Be Relieved to Know it is Now Harder To Discipline Bad Cops in Arizona” [Coyote] NYT runs Title IX “roster management” through a feminist echo chamber [Heather Mac Donald, Secular Right] Even with the slant, colleges’ willingness to contort their programs to comply with quotas tends to prove critics’ case [Althouse, Wendy Parker, College Sports Council, more] “AT&T v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:39 am
In Sable v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
In 1975, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
Case No. 3, the eyeballing case, is U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
But then U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:13 pm
Chakrabarty, 444 U.S. 1028 (1980). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:14 am
Here is an excerpt from the opinion, Parker v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:35 pm
The case is reported at U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
, Inc., 2008 U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
See Cape v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
And in Erlinger v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
A grant would appear to be quite likely, because there is a definite conflict among the Circuit Courts on the meaning of the Second Amendment, and the Supreme Court has not ruled on the issue since a somewhat ambiguous decision in 1939 (U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
, Inc., 2008 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm
Poole v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Lawyers from the ACLU and the U.S. [read post]
