Search for: "UNITED STATES CELLULAR"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Monday, Sept. 30 Simmons Ruth Simmons“The State of Conscience in University Life Today”James E. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:08 am
She sent the request to “a member of the Executive Protection Unit (EPU) of the Washington State Patrol. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:33 pm
The study sought to reconcile the conclusion that talking on a cell phone while driving increased the risk of crash with the fact that, although cell phone use has increased over the past few decades, the number of car crashes per mile traveled in the United States has decreased. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:58 am
Ivers, was a citizen of the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
As reported in a New York Times article in 2012, tracking by police with the help of geolocation devices is widespread across the United States, more often than not with no court oversight. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:20 am
But I interpret the vagueness of the United States Trade Representative's veto letter as a clear sign that SEP-based import bans are acceptable only under very rare circumstances. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:07 am
There have been several developments in the law since then, including earlier this week when the Fifth Circuit rendered its decision in In re Application of the United States of America for Historical Cell Site [...] [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
United Cellular was sued for refusing to accommodate the religious beliefs of a Seventh Day Adventist. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:12 am
The UKUSA Agreement, which links intelligence agencies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, was declassified by the NSA in 2011, but its existence was reported much earlier. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
Although petitioners' constitutional claims that the Cell Phone Rules violate the Federal and State Constitutions might arguably be determined under CPLR article 78 provisions allowing a challenge of a decision of a body on the ground that it was in violation of law, as both Constitutions are respectively the supreme law of the United States and State of New York effectively rules out this approach. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
United Cellular, Inc., the allegation is that the company failed to make reasonable accommodations for an observant Seventh Day Adventist employee. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
If after Citizens United we've decided to treat corporations as people, after all, then perhaps my cell-service provider has Fourth Amendment rights, too? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:09 am
Look at a state map showing cellular service areas and you’ll see those areas effectively blanket the state, with particular cellular license areas coterminous with county boundaries. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
Gaona–Gomez admitted he was a Mexican national and was in the United States “without the proper immigration documents. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:34 am
Finally, to the extent that the Commission majority's analysis herein is otherwise inconsistent with the analysis in his dissenting views, he affirms the analysis in his dissenting views.And here's the full text of the public redacted version of his dissenting statement:PUBLIC VERSIONDISSENTING VIEWS OF COMMISSIONER PINKERT ONTHE COMMISSION'S ISSUANCE OFAN EXCLUSION ORDER AND A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDERAlthough I concur with my colleagues on all issues related to claim construction, infringement, and… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:26 am
Until 2004, hepatitis A was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:57 am
The United States would be unable to protest, given the actions of its own ITC." [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:54 am
Microsoft argues that the bond is no longer necessary because the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled in November 2013 that the Google subsidiary wasn't entitled (on a global basis) to injunctive relief. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
No smartphone patent case has reached the Supreme Court of the United States yet, but it may very well happen at some point in the not too distant future.If certiorari is denied, the infringement ruling per se becomes final. [read post]
