Search for: "UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT"
Results 661 - 680
of 735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Dutkanych v United States Fid. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
Payton is known for his successful record in some of the most important and visible civil rights cases in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:15 pm
Eligible contract participant The term “eligible contract participant” means— (A) acting for its own account— (i) a financial institution; (ii) an insurance company that is regulated by a State, or that is regulated by a foreign government and is subject to comparable regulation as determined by the Commission, including a regulated subsidiary or affiliate of such an insurance company; (iii) an investment company subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Lefaivre v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Corporate Liability Under the ATCA In the past, the ATCA was developed in order to create laws that give aliens access to the federal court system in order to protect foreign merchants who are willing to do business with the U.S. [3] Another concern of the Act was to show to foreign nations that the United States would be considered a nation of laws that would not allow for torts to be avoided simply because the tortfeasors were not citizens of the… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:13 pm
The amendments: specify detailed information that must be included in the periodic account statements and annual reports for commodity pools with more than one series or class of ownership interest; clarify that the periodic account statements must disclose either the net asset value per outstanding participation unit in the pool or the total value of a participant’s interest or share in the pool; extend the time period for filing and distributing annual reports of commodity pools… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:30 am
But the allegations about testing of products relate only to McDonald's and Burger King; there is just an allegation that Friendly's "is assumed to be aware of health issues pertinent to restaurants anywhere in the United States" and and even more conclusory, "Upon information and belief, Defendants' grilled chicken products are prepared in the same manner throughout the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In Ogle, the Second Circuit extended its holding in United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Born in England in 1819, Joshua Norton emigrated to the United States in 1849, settling in San Francisco during the California gold rush to begin a career as a merchant. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
United States Issue: Whether the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
Introduction In Part III (here) we examined the background of Stolt-Nielsen and identified four issues that the United States Supreme Court will likely confront when it decides the case. [read post]
