Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 661 - 680
of 51,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 9:01 am
Sava v. 21st Century Spirits, LLC, 2024 WL 3161625, No. 22 C 6083 (N.D. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am
The later case of Ortovox v Mammut somewhat cleared things up, given that (in the absence of a protective letter) the party’s response to a warning letter was considered reflective of their substantive arguments. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:53 am
On June 13, the Supreme Court decided Vidal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:33 am
Salinas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
In fact, the issue concerned interstate jurisdiction, given that both Abu Dhabi and Dubai have their autonomous judicial systems, independent from each other and other court systems available in the UAE federation.[9] The second challenge concerned international jurisdiction, and that by arguing that English courts, as the court chosen by the parties in any dispute arising from their marriage, were competent. ii. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm
Justice Scalia wrote in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
Furthermore, the District would have us do what the Supreme Court admonished against in Matal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:47 am
Given the legal framework, negligence in motor vehicle operation includes distractions such as cell phone use, which is prohibited by law while driving. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
In contrast, the Biden administration has used TPS protection quite aggressively. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
The devil is likely in the details for any given case. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
Please note that during the Q&A portion of the event, priority will be given to participants in Room XXII.The OHCHR is also accepting input related to the Helpdesk project even at this formative stage in its development.On behalf of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics, I will be submitting input for consideration in the development of this Helpdesk Initiative. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
