Search for: "US v. Stone"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm
The Galasso Case While not involving a stock appraisal contest, the discoverability in a shareholder dispute of an appraisal prepared for an estate tax return was front and center in the Appellate Division, Third Department’s recent decision in Galasso v Cobleskill Stone Products, Inc., 169 AD3d 1344 [3d Dept 2019]. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
SCOTUS heard oral arguments in Knick v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
” Tichy v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The same website has a piece about NDAs entitled “Should Canada restrict the use of gag orders in sexual abuse cases? [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
Lawrence J. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:26 am
The fair dealing exceptions contemplated by s 12(1) of the Copyright Act have not been subject of judicial interpretation until the case of Moneyweb (Pty) Limited v Media 24 Limited and Another. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Blackmailing victims using their sexual activity as leverage is a crime as old as time, but this form of sextortion is a uniquely modern phenomenon insofar as it relies of the use of modern technology in the acquisition of material and the threat of dissemination. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am
BagSpot * AdWords Buys Using Geographic Terms Support Personal Jurisdiction–Rilley v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Snap removals are permitted by federal statute and can be used to the defendants’ advantage when the case is ripe for such a removal.In 2021, the Tenth Circuit in Woods v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
This left in place only the preliminary injunction in Stone v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm
”{See also, Russell & Anor v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1555 (TCC)}The said case suggests that English law is not averse to an agreement, which provides even for extension of limitation period since the argument regarding whether the agreement had actually extended the time was considered and rejected not on the basis of whether law allows it but on the basis of construction of contract (see, Paras 46 to 56 of Russell v Stone). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
In the case of Boulger v Woods, 2019, No.18-3170, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a libel claim against actor James Wood over a tweet during the 2016 election campaign. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Kat friend John William Shaw (Stone King LLP) ponders over the potential outcome of one of the cases if it were heard in the UK. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
The Court of International Trade has once again classified sports sandals in 6404.19.Under the 1927 ruling in a Supreme Court decision known as United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
A stone in the shoe. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 9:21 am
Zoning laws and zoning maps are not caste in stone. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 5:37 am
Circuit in the Qassim v. [read post]
