Search for: "USA v. August" Results 661 - 680 of 810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
August Event Update CBA Canadian Legal Conference & Expo August 15-17,   2010 Niagara, Ontario Click here for more information ILTA 2010 August 22-26, 2010 Las Vegas, NV Click here for more information. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:52 pm by Patent Docs
Shire Development Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:11 pm by Patent Docs
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
    (In 2009, the Fed, later backed by a new law from Congress, imposed a 45-day advance notice for implementing a default rate increase, but that only applies to increases that would go into effect after last August, and not the ones at issue in Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The judge, in a 1,600-page decision in August 2006, ruled that the nine companies and two trade groups had engaged in a scheme to defraud smokers and potential smokers by falsely denying smoking’s health hazards, its addictive nature, the industry’s manipulation of cigarettes to assure more nicotine delivery, the intentional marketing of cigarettes to youth, and second-hand smoke  as a cause of diseases. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
Black Hat USA 2010 July 23-29, 2010 Las Vegas, NV Click here for more information. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:35 pm by Patent Docs
Allergan Inc. et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
Black Hat USA 2010 July 23-29, 2010 Las Vegas, NV Click here for more information. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:51 pm
USA, Inc., 418 F.3d 1326, 1348 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
USA, 583 F.3d 766, 773 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:39 am by Anna Christensen
  Looking forward, the New York Times reports on next week’s upcoming argument in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]