Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed this proclamation and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
Albania International Extradition Treaty with the United States March 1, 1933, Date-Signed November 14, 1935, Date-In-Force The treaty was first signed at Tirana on March 1, 1933. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:34 pm
” Gannett Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Code § 1291, which gives the federal Courts of Appeals “jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States”. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
The Court asked the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
“When stating the reasons for nondisclosure, a judge should `state with particularity the facts, without disclosing the secrets sought to be protected, that . . . persuade the court to seal the document or continue it under seal. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
And the Constitution of the United States — hated by conservatives and most law enforcement officials everywhere — makes this possible, by virtue of a little-known bit of text known as the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:03 am
Supp.2d 584; United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 5140729 (M.D. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm
Today’s CAAF order provides: That the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court to 1) obtain the transcripts of the Article 39(a) sessions held on September 13 and 14, 2010, both sealed and unsealed; 2) determine whether the sealed portion should remain sealed; and 3) determine whether the military judge abused his discretion in determining that good cause… [read post]
