Search for: "Union v. Young*"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2011, 6:19 am
(photo credit) Along with the decision in DeShaney v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:01 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:57 am
Hastings Union Free Sch. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
At the outset of the Union, only male property owners could vote. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 3:16 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:28 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
It’s not because newly married same-sex couples’ unions are likely to suddenly founder. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:34 pm
(The Court also invalidated a California law that prohibited employers who receive state funds from using that money to promote or discourage union organization; I'll write about that case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
Can you give us some background on the OSHA case that has gotten so much attention, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm
In 2013 UNISON, one of the UK’s largest trade unions, said in its anti-bullying guidance that cyber bullying is as common as the more traditional face-to-face workplace bullying. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Davis also issued a general order that captured Union black soldiers would be enslaved. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem manager's sex/discharge suitDC CircuitDouglas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
In an op-ed for The San Diego Union-Tribune, Denise Harle maintains that “all Americans should consider it great news that the Supreme Court is taking a hard look at the Reproductive FACT Act” in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am
For instance, in Weinberger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
In relation to the child born of their union the Court found that the treatment of illegitimate children amounted to a breach of Art 8 of the Convention. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
” In Inside Higher Ed, Linda Hirshman suggests that Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
