Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 661 - 680 of 2,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
While asylum law in the United States is by no means perfect, I think that the subjects of the Hathaway/Pobjoy article, HJ and HT, could have won asylum here under the existing legal framework. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Kate Mancuso
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 The articles by Scallan et al. (1,2) in this issue represent the latest efforts to develop such estimates of the magnitude of foodborne illness in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Constitution, which states that the nation’s “judicial Power” shallextend to all Cases . . . arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, . . . to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between . . . between a State and Citizens of another State; [and] between Citizens of different States. . . . [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am by Sai Vinod
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]