Search for: "United States v. Gray" Results 661 - 680 of 980
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
The defendant moved to suppress the physical evidence under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am by Justin E. Gray
Recently, a defendant in a false marking case pending before the Western District of Pennsylvania (FLFMC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Justice Ginsburg (picture, left) stated"What earthly sense would it make to prefer goods that are manufactured abroad over those manufactured in the United States? [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
  Without U.S. citizenship, Flores-Villar was deported for committing a crime and charged with being present in the United States illegally when he tried to return. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am by Stephanie Figueroa
§602(a)(1), allowed it to block importation of the wristwatches because it had not authorized those watches to be sold in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Jeff Carroll
By contrast, Benesh noted that every time a United States President makes a big decision, it eats away at his public approval rating. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:11 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to the United States’ response to the petitioner’s traverse in the capital habeas case of Gray v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
 Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]