Search for: "United States v. Holmes"
Results 661 - 680
of 867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:08 pm
United States, 54 Treas. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:51 pm
United States,Misc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm
United States, Misc. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
ACCA reportedly denies petition for extraordinary relief arising from 5th Stryker Brigade Article 32
8 Jan 2011, 8:59 am
Phil Cave’s blog notes this military.com story reporting that ACCA yesterday denied the petition for extraordinary relief arising from the United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Moreover, those substances could not be purchased from suppliers inside the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
") Proceedings of the Bar and Officers of the Supreme Court of the United States in Memory of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, November 26, 1938 (full text via the HathiTrust Digital Library) George S. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
United States, No. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
Defendant contends that he was conducting a protest, but his 1st Amendment rights do not permit him to falsely report an impending fire (see Schenck v United States, 249 US 47, 52 [1919]).... [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
But, Winston Churchill envisaged the United States of Europe. [read post]
