Search for: "United States v. Kelly" Results 661 - 680 of 845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm by John Floyd
United States, that upheld this horrendous program implemented by the F.D.R. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
Research Paper Series, Paper No. 03-22), available at [ssrn.com]. 3 Id. 4 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
United StatesLindell v Mail Media Inc.Decision Date: December 10, 2021 The US District Court in Southern New York dismissed Michael Lindell’s defamation complaint against Mail Media Inc. and Laura Collins and granted the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss since Lindell failed to state a viable claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
To begin with the unhappy news (at least for petitioners), the court denied review without comment in one-time relist Kelly v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(RelatIP)   United Kingdom Tweaks to the UK patent system (IPKat) UK IPO announces 100th Patent Office Opinion issued since s74A – or is it 98? [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
26 Jan 2025, 2:53 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" 3 Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1783, at 661 (1833). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  As the “Daily Mail” put it “Senior journalists have united in defence of the freedom of the press. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
In the example of a 50 year old teacher who would have worked until the age of 65, who earning $60,000/year, a Court can quantify the past and future income loss for the family unit. [read post]