Search for: "United States v. Mitchell" Results 661 - 680 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows state and federal courts to prosecute the same person for the same offense – “that could have important consequences for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
The Scots Law News and Jonathan Mitchell QC have already covered the issue at length, both links well worth a visit.In the meanwhile, here follows the ruling from the European Court of Human Rights … and lets hope in the light of Lord Penrose’ review of Court of Session business, which resulted in the recently enacted Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No. 2) (Causes in the Inner House) 2010, SSI 2010/30 (pdf) may clear some of these inequalities up, if… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am by Nicole Saharsky
(That case is not to be confused with Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 6:06 pm
In the meantime, I will provide my unfrozen caveman lawyer synopsis of the case.United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]