Search for: "United States v. North Carolina"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
J.D.B. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
Allen found infringement on websites hosted and operated by the State of North Carolina in 2013; the state settled, promising to pay royalties and provide attribution on all future uses. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
Last week, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina decided State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
On December 1, 2015, Allen sued the State of North Carolina for copyright infringement. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held yesterday in Collins v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Last week Bob had a post discussing the North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Last week Bob had a post discussing the North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
Supreme Court (Mar. 3, 2020) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm
The defendant was stopped for expired registration in the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:16 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, InVue Security Products Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Mobile Tech, Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI, formerly known as Merchandising Technologies, Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, but incorporated in Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 10,062,266, (the “‘266 patent”) for a… [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 6:35 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), and Kyllo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
The Court of Appeals explained that North Carolina, like the majority of jurisdictions, has adopted the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule, discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Nix v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 6:50 am
The court noted that the Fourth Circuit had revisited this issue post-Bruen in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1984 ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
