Search for: "United States v. Ocean"
Results 661 - 680
of 791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm
Recently (1996 through 2009), four or possibly five jaguars have been documented in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
United States, 150 F. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:43 pm
It will also give important support to plaintiffs in climate change litigation, such as Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
Several times a year, Teodoro Nguema Obiang arrives at the doorstep of the United States from his home in Equatorial Guinea, on his way to his $35 million estate in Malibu, Calif., his fleet of luxury cars, his speedboats and private jet. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm
(Full disclosure: one of the authors of this post, Marcus Asner, led this prosecution, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court found in the 1990 case of Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
Regal-Beloit Corporation Issue: Whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which governs certain rail and motor transportation by common carriers within the United States, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
United States; Rollins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 3:58 pm
Local 5 v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
Background Plaintiffs were individuals or entities that allegedly directly purchased from the defendants shipping services on ocean routes between the continental United States and Hawaii, Guam or both between October 11, 1999 and May 31, 2008. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:28 am
Well maybe we're about to find out.Patco Construction Company, Inc. v People's United Bank dba Ocean Bank, no pending in state court in Maine, may tell us just whose fault it really is, besides the cyber criminal of course.Patco was a long time customer of the bank but after losing hundreds of thousands of dollars from online theft and then getting a notice from the bank that they wanted Patco to pay it back, they decided they had enough. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:03 pm
Well maybe we're about to find out.Patco Construction Company, Inc. v People's United Bank dba Ocean Bank, no pending in state court in Maine, may tell us just whose fault it really is, besides the cyber criminal of course.Patco was a long time customer of the bank but after losing hundreds of thousands of dollars from online theft and then getting a notice from the bank that they wanted Patco to pay it back, they decided they had enough. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:06 am
Together we formed a united front on behalf of the property owners. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Certainly, the charges against de Saad were clarified, if not by the United States's filing of the Second Superseding Indictment, they were clarified by BIV's findings in its own internal audit after de Saad's indictment. [read post]
