Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 661 - 680 of 5,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
United States court case challenging the constitutionality of the ACA and its potential impact on individuals with pre-existing conditions. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:09 am by Steven Cohen
United States of America – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – October 20th, 2016) involves a medical malpractice claim. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In so ruling ,the Superior Court followed the reasoning of the united States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less,… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
  Click here to go to www.nylj.com   United States, appellee v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
—together controlled over 80 percent of digital music sold to end purchasers in the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:52 am by Gene Quinn
Just over three years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]