Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 661 - 680
of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 5:45 am
In Interactive Brokers, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
By Eric Goldman Cammarata v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) (see Kat friend Richard Vary's comment in the last update here). [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Moreover, this case further tilts the circuit split in favor of United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog] Other United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
" Such a result is particularly undesirable, AAI further explains, because the United States is likely to argue that "a price squeeze should be eliminated as an independent antitrust offense" - an issue that AAI "has vigorously contested . . . in its brief" but which respondents did not address. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The fact that finished cell phones were sold in the United states did not amount to a “direct effect” on U.S. commerce because “the effect of component price fixing on the price of the product of which it is a component is indirect”. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:37 am
On November 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in the matter of U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
And even the Ninth Circuit’s anticipated decision may not finally resolve the matter, as the issue could ultimately reach the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
