Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 661 - 680 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and Lagos v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:19 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:06 pm
Here's an interesting Fourth Amendment case from the Ninth Circuit written by Judge Gould and joined by Judges Paez and Rawlinson, via Decision of the Day.... [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The BBC reports that the Twitter alternative Parler has become the most-downloaded app in the United States as conservatives flock to the self-styled “free speech” app after the US election. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:12 am
In DUI case, majority concludes that machine-generated data concerning positive test in a blood sample was not a statement of the lab technicians and therefore was not a hearsay statement, since it was not made by a person but a machine analyzing the sample; no Confrontation Clause issues were raised, in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Clement will argue for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Oral argument season begins with a Navy case, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Altria Group v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:18 pm
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
., a Washington based corporation and owner/operator of multiple commercial trawling vessels, pleaded guilty in a Cordova Court yesterday to illegal fishing with Non-Pelagic Trawl gear in state waters that were closed to the use of trawl gear. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
At the time, Respondent did not communicate with Petitioner regarding his decision to keep the children in the United States. [read post]