Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 2"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2019, 8:38 am
Article 49.12 § 3g(a)(2) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (not impacted by the 2017 re-codification of Article 49.12) permits a trial court to enter a deadly weapon finding in a final judgment when the State shows, by “manner of use,” that the defendant used a motor vehicle as a deadly weapon. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:08 pm
Lindsey, 632 N.W.2d 652, 660–661 (II) (Minn. 2001) (blanket exclusion of children, which led to removal of two children of unknown age and unknown relationship to the accused). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:49 am
The state high court in Solari established a three-part test; an overbroad covenant could be saved and enforced at least in part when: (1) the agreement is “reasonably necessary to protect [an employer’s] legitimate interests; (2) it causes no undue hardship to the defendant; and (3) it does not burden the public interest. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
On 2 April 2015, these individuals attended the Claimants’ home to enter the property and obtain possession for the landlord (i.e. evict the tenants). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:23 am
However, it was these Defendants who obtained permission to appeal on the basis of their concern about the width of the “persons unknown” orders. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
AAn action that may culminate in one of these four outcomes is considered a separate child‑custody proceeding from an action that may culminate in a different one of these four outcomes@ (25 CFR 23.2[11][2]). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The Media Information Sheet stated that two unknown suspects had been involved in a robbery of a young girl and that the two suspects had a female accomplice whose role was unknown. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 12:27 pm
The statute does not criminalize innocent sexual conduct based on a fact – lack of permission – unknown to the defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
— Justice Holmes, letter to Lady Tweeddale, April 4, 1931 Question: Yours is the latest in a long line of Holmes biographies, including those by Francis Biddle (1942, pp. 214), Catherine Drinker Bowen (1944, pp. 475), Mark DeWolfe Howe (1957 & 1963, 2 vols, pp. 663), John S. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
In total, over 2 million older adults were affected by the current alleged fraud crimes. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Michigan: Dark Money Used to Evade Donor Disclosure Laws in MichiganDetroit News – Jonathan Oosting | Published: 3/7/2019 A dark money group that spent more than $2 million to help promote Gretchen Whitmer successful gubernatorial bid in the 2018 exploited a legal loophole to avoid disclosing any donors to the state or federal governments, and it is not alone. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:48 pm
Xu and his partners pleaded and were sentenced to anywhere between 1.5 to 4.5 years in prison up to 2 1/3 to 7 years incarceration before the Feds finished their piggybacking and took custody of the defendants. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 6:42 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
Several videos were uploaded to YouTube by unknown users containing works of her newly released studio album “A Winter Symphony” as well as recordings of her concert tour “Symphony Tour. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
” Reportedly, Jussie faked the hate crime because he was dissatisfied with his salary, which is currently unknown to the public but was reported in 2016 as $20,000 per episode. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
Increasingly, with a fervor heretofore unknown, USCIS is denying petitions that seek new or extended grants of employment authorization for prospective and current knowledge workers, while – in especially galling fashion – reopening and revoking previous work approvals for incumbent employees. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
Increasingly, with a fervor heretofore unknown, USCIS is denying petitions that seek new or extended grants of employment authorization for prospective and current knowledge workers, while – in especially galling fashion – reopening and revoking previous work approvals for incumbent employees. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
US District Judge Gene Pratter found that Rotkiske did not meet the requirements, which require, “a plaintiff to prove (1) ‘active misleading’ by the defendant, (2) which prevents the plaintiff from recognizing the validity of their claim within the limitations period, (3) where the plaintiff’s ignorance is not attributable to their lack of reasonable due diligence in attempting to uncover the relevant facts. [read post]
