Search for: "V-lawyer"
Results 661 - 680
of 67,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 10:22 am
Frequently, when foraging for blog fodder, I find the advice, tips and trends covered at freelance or tech start-up sites are more compelling and relevant than what’s available at […] Related posts:Book Review: The Freelance Lawyering Manual Making Mistakes Practice Tips, Courtesy of Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:37 pm
As usual, they have a very complete post laying out this issue, focused on the defense lawyers' perspective but much of it applies to plaintiffs' lawyers as well. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
European Commission v Italian Republic (Case C-565/08); [2011] WLR (D) 118 “Mandatory national provisions obliging lawyers to comply with maximum tariffs, in all cases where there was no conditional fee agreement or no special agreement between lawyer and client, were not contrary to articles 43EC and 49EC of the EC Treaty. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
This article "The Art of Written Persuasion: Part V - Improve Your Vocabulary, Improve Your Success" is a discussion of what is meant by "good vocabulary" - it is more than big words - and describes how lawyers use vocabulary to persuade. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 6:31 am
The opinion is styled, Texas Fair Plan Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:27 pm
The latest issue of Los Angeles Lawyer has an article by Michael Shipley titled "Maroney's Minefield: California's complicated rules for obtaining a new trial can lead all but the most careful to an unfair result" starting on page 29, about Maroney v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 9:59 pm
The case of Allen v Brethertons LLP [2019] EWHC B3 (Costs) has received a fair amount of commentary in relation to the entitlement of non-Costs Lawyers to undertake certain “reserved activities”. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
The Blog of Legal Times yesterday posted this entry about the "changing role of criminal defense lawyers" in view of the recent Supreme Court case, Padilla v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:15 am
Here's the abstract: This article critically examines how elite lawyers built and defended the legal framework for White Supremacy in the Deep South both before and after Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm
In 2015, the US Supreme Court’s upheld same-sex marriage rights in the Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 8:14 am
On January 9, 2013 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Maracich v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:42 am
It is nearly 60 years since the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously held, in Gideon v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:00 am
In Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:18 am
In Capital City Church of Christ v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 11:58 am
Attorneys Nick Laurent, Blaire Knox, and Andrew York were recently featured in an in-depth interview with Super Lawyers senior editor Beth Taylor, where they discussed their pivotal win in the case of Texas Department of Transportation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
There is more to the parallel than the David v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
The case of Lau v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
A Californian case is an illustration of how lawyers should be careful in court, and how the court can draw inferences from lawyers' behaviour.In Michael Gdowski v Diana Gdowski[PDF], Michael, aged 83, sought a protection order against his daughter Diana, aged 56.At trial, the trial judge did not know who to believe as it was one person's word against the other.What tipped it over the edge, [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
Service of Northern Ireland; M v Same [2009] UKHL 15; [2009] WLR(D) 90 “The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (’RIPA’) permitted covert surveillance of communications between lawyers and their clients covered by legal professional privilege and notwithstanding any statutory rights of persons in custody to consult privately with their lawyers. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 2:47 am
The Judge in the infamous ChatGPT lawyer case (Mata v Avianca) this week suggested what ChatGPT produced was “legal gibberish”. [read post]
