Search for: "Venkat"
Results 661 - 680
of 834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
[Post by Venkat with a brief comment from Eric] Sasqua Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm
I agree with Venkat that Twitter can take some experimenting with to figure it. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm
[Post by Venkat] Hoang et al v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm
This is a logical move; Venkat and I both have been tracking cases interpreting the analogous California Penal Code 502. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
[Post by Venkat] Bott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm
[Post by Venkat, with some comments from Eric below] Vernor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Thanks to Venkat at the Technology and Marketing Law blog for originally posting about it. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm
[Post by Venkat] Amira Jabbar v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:35 am
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:12 pm
[Post by Venkat] In re Google Buzz User Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:10-CV-00672-JW (N.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:55 pm
[Post by Venkat] Jagex Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
[Post by Venkat] In re Reverb Communications, FTC No. 092-3199 (Aug. 26, 2010) (Settlement) Professor Goldman has posted a bunch about the FTC's endorsement guidelines. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:45 pm
[Post by Venkat] In re: Easysaver Rewards Litigation (S.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
As Venkat notes: But I will say one thing. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:05 am
Laura, at the needling of Venkat Balasubramani (whose name I've gratuitously tossed in here), squares up the pervasively mistaken grasp and abuse of the First Amendment by no less a potential presidential candidate than Sarah Palin. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
Now I differ with Venkat in one important respect. [read post]
"Electronically Printed" Does not Include Automated Merchant Email -- Shlahtichman v. 1-800 Contacts
17 Aug 2010, 3:30 pm
[Post by Venkat] Shlahtichman v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Case No. 09-4073 (7th Cir.; Aug. 10, 2010) The Seventh Circuit recently concluded that the words "electronically printed," as used in the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, does not include a computer generated email receipt sent by a merchant. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Thursday, I participated in an all-lawyer panel with Madhu Singh, Rebecca Yoshitani and Venkat Balasubramani. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:49 pm
[Post by Venkat] Furey v. [read post]
