Search for: "W. E. Davis"
Results 661 - 678
of 678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 9:48 am
Matthew E. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:21 am
Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
In mentioning the Williams presumption, the Court here notes in a footnote that "[w]e have previously rejected the argument ‘that a sentence within a proper Guidelines range is per-se reasonable.'" Citing Webb.Webb -- McBride -- Foreman -- Richardson/BookerWilliamsWhat seemed to be a fairly straight-forward rule in Richardson lasted barely two months before being limited. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:56 am
163 Reports so far. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Court
Legal Times
President George W. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The language used by the New York Court of Appeals is representative:[W]e must, most importantly, determine the consistency of [negligence per se] with the purposes underlying the legislative scheme. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
., W. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Gardner, David W. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:17 am
Ward W. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 12:00 pm
This line in one footnote of Hankton really caught my attention:[W]e dismiss out of hand Davis's assertion in his brief that Mykytiuk "sends the message that a sentence within the Guidelines will never be reversed.... [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
Professor Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University Law Center.Douglas W. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
In affirming the administrative law judge, the Board held that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging employee Ronald W. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 7:55 am
Foley, 833 N.E.2d 130 (Mass. 2005), a companion case to Gonsalves involving responses to the question "[W]here is he? [read post]
7 Sep 2005, 2:31 pm
Aderholt (R-Haleyville, AL) Robert E. [read post]
7 Sep 2005, 2:31 pm
Aderholt (R-Haleyville, AL) Robert E. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
[Update June 21, 2007: The original interpretation of the Nebra Sky Disk which was challenged below by the Law Pundit has been discarded in the interim by the archaeologists and astronomers. [read post]
4 Dec 0001, 4:00 pm
Suite 104, Redlands, CA 92374 T: (909) 708-6055 E: michael@michaelreiterlaw.com W: http://michaelreiterlaw.com [read post]
