Search for: "WARD v. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2016, 4:33 pm
’”[v] One clear finding we worry about is the apparent lack of cybersecurity literacy, awareness and risk assessments among U.S. and U.K. independent directors surveyed. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Bordi reviewed Minor's attendance record, and there was no indication of any out-of-state travel.Officer Hopwood testified he responded to the school on the report of a student with a firearm, and in the principal's office he took custody of the confiscated firearm and magazine cartridge. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
” She obtained the weapon to ward off further attacks by an abusive boyfriend. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:51 am
In Fridman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am
Noting that the ADA does not require an employer to grant the specific accommodation that a disabled employee desires, the court found no support for the employee’s failure-to-accommodate claim (Ward v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:02 pm
In 1991, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia University Hospitals v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:08 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
Doe” or United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
In a classic case of statutory interpretation, in which every technical thrust seemed to be met by an equally adept technical parry, Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
Supreme Court this morning decided Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
She says so in today's dissent in Lockhart v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
The respondent member nonetheless moved to dismiss the petition, relying on a series of Second and Third Department decisions dismissing for lack of jurisdiction petitions seeking to dissolve foreign business entities, including Matter of Warde-McCann (2d Dept 1987) involving a Delaware corporation, Matter of Porciello (2d Dept 1998) involving a Florida corporation, Matter of MHS Venture Management Corp. (2d Dept 2009) involving a Delaware LLC, and… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
The respondent member nonetheless moved to dismiss the petition, relying on a series of Second and Third Department decisions dismissing for lack of jurisdiction petitions seeking to dissolve foreign business entities, including Matter of Warde-McCann (2d Dept 1987) involving a Delaware corporation, Matter of Porciello (2d Dept 1998) involving a Florida corporation, Matter of MHS Venture Management Corp. (2d Dept 2009) involving a Delaware LLC, and… [read post]
