Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE" Results 661 - 680 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  Plaintiffs can indeed challenge government regulations as Takings — but they must do so as an as-applied challenge, which means that they must go to state court first, as Williamson County and San Remo Hotel held, with the claim- and issue-preclusion effects of prior state court judgments. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
The state's highest criminal court has already voided Morton's conviction in the murder of his wife, Christine Morton, who was beaten to death while lying in bed in their southwestern Williamson County home. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:10 am by Patricia Salkin
Ferncliff Cemetery Association, Inc. v Town of Greenburgh, 2021 WL 31948 (2nd Cir CA 2/1/2021) [read post]