Search for: "Walker v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Pecover et al v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am
And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 332 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Walker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
Lord Walker held that this went too far. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
See Berkner v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm
But that would be wrong: state election laws have been struck down in light of Citizens United. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals yesterday for the ready slogans to counter that notion: As Judge Wilkey wrote for the court in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:40 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
Walker was aided by a provision of state campaign finance law related to recall elections. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
Walker. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Walker, 11-1011, another Sixth Circuit state-on-top habeas case, which presents a question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
