Search for: "Washington v. Louisiana" Results 661 - 680 of 990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 15-946, presented a general challenge to the constitutionality of the death penalty, as well as a challenge to Louisiana’s failure to require a jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that death is the appropriate penalty. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Nunziato, George Washington University Law School. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
District of Columbia As of January 1, 2022, Washington, D.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Louisiana (2008), death is not a lawful punishment for a relatively minor crime like shoplifting. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, in Louisiana, and probably elsewhere, emotional distress claims are subsumed by product liability statutes. [read post]
Irex, combined with prior Louisiana appellate court rulings, largely settles the scope of the LUTSA’s preemption for future disputes. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
For those hoping for a quick resolution to today’s political drama, you may be disappointed; in the hard-fought Senate race in Georgia, a run-off is likely and in Louisiana, one is required. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am by Derek T. Muller
Utah and Oregon privileged both in-state graduates and a good chunk of out-of-state graduates; Washington and Louisiana privileged essentially all ABA-accredited graduates. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
As of this date, Pennsylvania, Washington, and West Virginia have applied for Appendix K waivers and received approvals from CMS.[6] Medicaid Disaster State Plan Amendment Template Each Medicaid program has a state plan which describes the state’s rules related to eligibility, benefits and payments. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
Louisiana, have developed a robust doctrine of sovereign immunity supposedly rooted in the assumptions of the Constitution's ratifiers. [read post]