Search for: "Washington v. Roberts" Results 661 - 680 of 4,695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Case Could Shape Gun Laws: Supreme Court Is Asked to Uphold Ban" is the headline to a lengthy Sept. 5th story by Robert Barnes and David Nakamura in the Washington Post. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:37 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: Last term in Salazar v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by David Markus
  From the Blog of the Legal Times:  The issue comes to the court in a Washington drug case, Ball v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:03 pm
"Contraception compromise acceptable if it ends legal challenges, administration says": Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that the “Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with the president’s plan to temporarily ban citizens from six mostly Muslim countries, elevating a divisive legal battle involving national security and religious discrimination to the nation’s highest court. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 2:11 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Robert McKenna, Attorney General of Washington (Contracts; Constitutional Law) on 2/2/15. * U.S. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:29 pm by Molly Runkle
The Court also ruled today in Wittman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Laurence Tribe argues that the Supreme Court should review Hidalgo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Philip Bobbitt
Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in the landmark Supreme Court case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:47 am
The attorneys for 800 Adapt, Inc. have recently filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari review of 800 Adapt, Inc. v. [read post]