Search for: "Webster v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 2186 (3d ed. 2002). [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
Jerry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:45 am
In The North Carolina Mutual Whole Company v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
Hinton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
(hereinafter Applicant) v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 12:41 pm
Justice Scalia penned a concurrence in Webster v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:57 pm
The defendant was asked to recite the alphabet from "C" to "V". [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:11 pm
Each occurred in one part of just one state (western Massachusetts and western Pennsylvania, respectively). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
"Incorrigible" is defined as a person who is "incapable of being corrected, not reformable" (Merriam-Webster) and, thus this term is completely out of line with the current understanding of the goals of our Family Court system. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
In Regina v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Barson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:29 pm
I’m also assuming, simply because they claimed it in the complaint they filed (h/t to Above the Law for this entry on the lawsuit), that the named plaintiffs in McDonald v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am
Instead, it relied on the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definitions of “essential” and “function” in proceeding with its analysis, concluding that an essential function must be a core activity of a petitioning organization. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:26 am
A recent 2-1 Michigan Court of Appeals decision published earlier this month, Porter v Hill, ruled that when a “natural” parent’s rights to their child are terminated, the grandparents rights are terminated along with the parents. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
SynEcology Partners, L3C v. [read post]
