Search for: "Weinstein v Weinstein"
Results 661 - 680
of 875
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
Weinstein, 411 S.W.2d 267, 272 (Mo. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Roseborough v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:20 pm
EDNY Judge Weinstein’s much publicized sentencing decision in the securities fraud case, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 1:26 am
Dept. 2003) - $2,500,000 for past pain and suffering (7 years) upheld for a 43 year old woman in a pedestrian knockdown car accident who sustained several skull fractures and significant and progressive brain damage that left her permanently demented Weinstein v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
Weinstein, 2010 WL 185416, No. 09CA0724 (Colo. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:32 am
Last Act: 02/23/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCES6902 VALESKY -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/23/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONLast Action Date: 02/24/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
On the issue of plaintiff's alleged negligence, defendant did not submit any competent evidence showing that plaintiff failed to exercise the degree of care commonly exercised by a member of the legal profession (see Orchard Motorcycle Distrib., Inc. v Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP, 49 AD3d 292 [2008]; Schadoff v Russ, 278 AD2d 222 [2000]). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:27 am
Mulligan Law Firm v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
From United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:08 pm
Zoleo v Weinstein Family Services of NY, OATH Index No. 623/09In 2005, the City Council passed the Local Civil Rights Restoration Act, which provides that the City Human Rights law shall be liberally construed " [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
The Jan. 22, 2010 sentencing statement(Download Butler3) in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Rev. 1107, 1116-20 (2006) (likewise); James Weinstein, Speech Categorization and the Limits of First Amendment Formalism: Lessons from Nike v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
Blunt v. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
The case of Levy v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
Weinstein, James H.R. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
Here's a copy, Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust v. [read post]
