Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 661 - 680 of 29,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am by Justice Goodwin Liu
Justice Goodwin Liu is an associate justice of the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
The Court effectively overruled a very recent precedent (McConnell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm by Lindsay See
City of Philadelphia, Catholic Social Services and two foster parents ask the court to revisit Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am by Adam Winkler
” Yet this term found the Justices gravitating to the Chief Justice’s vision in a surprising number of cases in which the philosophical disagreements on the Court might well have been expected to control – from abortion and guns to environmental regulation (Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Chief Justice John Roberts says, “In case number 16-349, Henson versus Santander Consumer USA, Justice Gorsuch has his first opinion for the court. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Justice Dufour of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Vanston v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
To which the Court of Appeal says that, as a matter of law, even if there's negligence, the Bank's not liable.I keep thinking: "I've got to be totally off base here, right? [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
A wonderful result would have been full endorsement of the position endorsed by Justice Ginsburg in Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by INFORRM
The five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) unanimously overturned the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision given by Lady Justice Sharp, Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
This echoed Justice Scalia’s dissenting view in the Court’s last residual clause case (Sykes v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
This week at the Supremes: We know of no anticipated military justice developments at the Supreme Court this week. [read post]