Search for: "Will v. People"
Results 661 - 680
of 72,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
There are lots of people who would be guilty of murder if it's enough that they don't care that someone's "hurt" who definitely wouldn't be guilty of murder if the required showing is that they have to not care that someone may be killed by their actions sufficient to demonstrate a "conscious disregard for human life. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Regina v O Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Those who prosecuted defendants charged with immigration offences who might be victims of people-trafficking must be aware of the protocols in relation to such victims enshrined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; defence lawyers must make inquiries if there was credible material showing that their client might have been such a victim, especially if the client was young. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
In three prior appeals, of which we took judicial notice, the same prosecutor was criticized for improper conduct, including the observation in People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:27 am
(Orin Kerr) I recently taught one of my favorite criminal law cases, People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:40 am
Woman Says Sex-Change Tax Battle Was Victory for All Transgender People :: TaxProf Blog Summary :: O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:05 pm
Remember Marbury v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
As they did several weeks ago in Elektra v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:41 pm
On a more visceral, rather than logical, level.There are some people who are prototypical examples of why one -- at least emotionally, and often intellectually -- wants the death penalty. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:52 pm
Thankfully, I'm not in the habit of kidnapping people and putting one in their ear. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual people with real-life problems, but the scripts nevertheless adhered to basic Hollywood formulae such as “Have an exciting climax. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
I'm entirely confident that most people who have pleaded guilty will in fact not be able to successfully petition for factual innocence. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
But I'm not exactly sure why we want to stop people from letting their spouses come here. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
Some people are happy with short, concise opinions that read (to me) more as advocacy summaries than as opinions; others take a contrary view. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
It doesn't like that it's compelled to do so, and notes that it has "sent a number of people to prison for first degree murder for less than the sentence" it felt it had to impose here. [read post]
