Search for: "York v. York"
Results 661 - 680
of 47,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2008, 1:33 am
As stated stated in this post, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:05 am
In Eyes of the World, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Belle Ctr. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Belle Ctr. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm
The tide may be turning in employers’ favor in New York with respect to frequency of pay claims. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
See Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:01 am
Here's the BIO in Harmon v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
” The lawsuit, New York et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
A copy of the Kristin Booth Glen's opinion, published in the New York Law Journal, page 27, today, is available here and the front-page article is available here, and continued here.This ruling is consistent with a February 2008 New York appellate decision in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
State of New York U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:34 pm
A New York appeals court ruled on this issue in Lewis v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:44 pm
Karamian v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
Edwards v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
Corp., 35 NY3d 492, 505 n 8; see Foy v State of New York, 71 Misc 3d 605 [Ct Cl]). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 5:50 pm
The facts in the recent Appellate Division, Second Department decision in Torres v City of New York are a good example of an attorney's need to listen closely to the trial court's charge to the jury. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm
Free Speech L. 509 (2022); here's the Introduction: The actual malice rule of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
In Janecka v. [read post]
