Search for: "clarence"
Results 661 - 680
of 8,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2023, 5:30 pm
“The People’s Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:45 pm
Clarence Thomas Basically Pulled An "If Feathers Are Light, Why Can't I See With Them? [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
” ProPublica’s Tuesday report follows a series of previous reports on Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:17 pm
” As is now common in Indian law cases, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to urge the court to reconsider foundational principles of federal Indian law, his third apparent response to Gorsuch’s pro-tribal writings this term. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
The majority, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, ruled that such challenges are barred by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), in cases where the prisoner had filed a previous habeas petition challenging his conviction—even if there was no way for him to bring up the Supreme Court's later ruling (which reversed the lower-court precedent under which Jones was convicted). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
The post “Clarence Thomas’ Latest Criminal Justice Ruling Is an Outright Tragedy” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:19 am
The post Clarence Thomas Just Wrote The Dumbest Paragraph In The History Of Indian Law appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
In a series of stories, ProPublica has charged Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito with two types of misconduct. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
“Clarence Thomas Went After My Work. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
[Law360] * Clarence Thomas's dissent in the False Claims Act case ran contrary to everything "Originalism" claims to believe. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
” In a similar vein, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in 2020 that “Chevron is in serious tension with the Constitution, the APA, and 100 years of judicial decisions” by constraining judicial power. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:44 pm
“Amul Thapar ‘The People’s Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him.'” Hugh Hewitt has posted the video of this interview on YouTube. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
Then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor, Scalia and Clarence Thomas voted to let the lower court action and the charges against the men stand. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:40 am
” The post “Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Rejecting a standard approved by eleven federal courts of appeal because this standard permitted “judge-empowering interest-balancing,” Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the Court announced: “When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:35 pm
“What Justice John Paul Stevens’s Papers Reveal About Affirmative Action; Twenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote, in a draft opinion, that white applicants could not be favored over Asian Americans; Why did she delete those lines — and why did Justice Clarence Thomas adopt them in his own opinion? [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
Recent weeks have seen a flurry of investigative activity on Capitol Hill, including probes by House committees into Hunter Biden and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s New York indictment of former president Donald Trump, demands by Senate committees for information about Supreme Court ethics rules and gifts received by Justice Clarence Thomas, a subpoena from the House Foreign Affairs Committee to obtain access to a key State Department document regarding the Afghanistan… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Given the relatively arcane subject matter, Justice Elena Kagan wrote a delightfully lively majority opinion in Polansky parsing the various provisions and sub-provisions of the FCA to conclude that the government’s dismissal motion was timely after all and should be evaluated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, just like a comparable non-qui-tam motion for voluntary dismissal.Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenter. [read post]
