Search for: "v. Cox"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2013, 9:28 am
LEXIS 111365 (SD NY, Aug. 7, 2013), a New York federal district court dismissed a suit by a Muslim inmate who complained that he could not attend Friday Jumu'ah services while he was in disciplinary confinement.In Cox v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:53 pm
Cox, 2017 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:35 pm
Cox, 2008 U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:38 am
Finally, The court decided Currier v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
He alleges he was injured on March 24 while working aboard the M/V Audrey. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 5:51 am
Penny Co., 994 F.2d 1101, 1106 (5th Cir. 1993); Cox v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
He also described the data log showing packets between a Cox Communications IP address and MediaSentry. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
” Cox, supra, 138 N.J. at 16 (citing D’Ercole Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:07 am
Cox Duke (Duke University) and Randall S. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
STHR GROUP https://t.co/HvWKcnxohb -> Link to FOX v FILMON rejecting it is entitled to a cable license https://t.co/YBu1hevujb -> Link to BMG c Cox case https://t.co/vJsZFp97Jb -> TRO granted to protect software trade secrets being reverse engineered ADVANCED INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS v COMPETENTUM https://t.co/haJvcJiMPm -> The IPKat: The fate of branding as we know it in a 3D-printing world https://t.co/rmTfHeYOoD -> The Liberals’ TPP consultation: more… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Padrick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:31 pm
V. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
"The case is Cox v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:29 pm
In BMG v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Cox's lawyer. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:00 pm
Cox, Inc.), and the petitioner has filed a supplemental brief concerning the Brown v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Cox. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Sehl v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:43 pm
Cox Communications (now on appeal, and about which I blogged here) and Capitol Records v. [read post]
