Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 7,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM) Peterlin's… [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 1:44 pm
The investment practices here were messy and should be fixed.What does the Indiana constitution have to see about the duties of the Governor vis-a-viz the Treasurer? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:06 pm
Moreover, Regulation 107 does not authorize any allocation of defense costs. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 8:17 pm
The Defendants took the case up to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:04 am
The defendants have not, in fact, 'locked up' an absolute majority of the votes required for the merger through the GEPT deal. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:18 pm
., according to the petition for writ of certiorari filed the losing party in the West Virginia Supreme Court, presents the following question:Justice Brent Benjamin of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia refused to recuse himself from the appeal of the $50 million jury verdict in this case, even though the CEO of the lead defendant spent $3 million supporting his campaign for a seat on the court -- more than 60% of the total amount spent to support Justice… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
So, how does a lawyer "select" a jury. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:30 pm
Doellstedt, 50 Cal.App.4th 1318, 1325, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 308 (1996) (quoting Saunders v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
As we have discussed in previous posts, cost is a critical issue because Collins & Aikman’s $50 million D&O insurance policy was exhausted as of July 31, 2008. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 9:38 pm
The CL-19 does not meet the minimum requirements for a medical/legal opinion and it would prejudice Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
" (Dickerson, Class Actions: The Law of 50 States (2008 ed.) [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:27 pm
It does not sound like it though. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
Sarah says she is “confident that the Court will conclude that a decision in favor of the defendant in this case won't unduly burden the 50 states”. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
Jamie, in his concluding thoughts on the Preaching to the Choir post, writes: Sarah says she is "confident that the Court will conclude that a decision in favor of the defendant in this case won't unduly burden the 50 states". [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
This final rebuttal ended the vigorous exchange with my colleague (who, to clarify, does not teach at American University). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
§2-302 does not even contain a definition or a standard to determine whether the terms of a contract are in fact unconscionable.[4] In attempting to provide a workable standard, paragraph (3) of the FPGPA looks to whether the amount charged: (i) grossly exceeds the average price at which the gasoline was offered for sale during the 30 days prior to such proclamation; (ii) grossly exceeds the price at which gasoline was readily obtainable in the same area from other competing… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:19 am
Ct. 50 (2008). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Pray, do complicate it for us and defend Hirst. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:29 pm
(There hasn't been one in New Hampshire in nearly 50 years.) [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
In response to the very first question (from Justice Kennedy) Wyeth's counsel stated the defendant's broad preemption position, "could they use. . .the precise label that in approving the application in 1998 the FDA required Wyeth to use, and also use the label that the Vermont jury determined should be used[?] [read post]
