Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 6781 - 6800 of 8,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 2:48 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The third case is Maqaleh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 am by Mandelman
Some Plaintiffs sought out face-to-face interviews by contacting Bank of America branch offices, but simply found themselves on speakerphones with the same unaccountable departments that had previously been providing them with misinformation by telephone. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am by Randy Barnett
[no commandeering of state legislatures] & Printz v U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm by Rosalind English
Meanwhile, over in Strasbourg… A complaint of a very different type of discrimination, the refusal of a European Convention state to allow same-sex couples to marry, was recently decided by the Strasbourg Court in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:46 pm by Mark Alexander
The Declaration stated it to be self-evident that all men are created equal. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Kenneth Anderson
  If it’s such a big problem, the political branches are free expressly to preempt the state measure. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 Once so boldly conservative on all the hot buttons when operating under the cover of Republican-controlled Legislative and Executive branches, the Roberts Court–now operating alongside Democratic political branches–appeared to have shaped an exceedingly modest OT09 docket so to have enough political capital to spend on Citizens United without irreparably damaging the Court’s institutional legitimacy. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is Grosz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 pm by John Elwood
United States (especially pp. 26–27 n.5) and its opp. in Franklin v. [read post]