Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6781 - 6800 of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2020, 4:32 am by SHG
Suppose that bullet A matched bullet B; bullet B matched bullet C; and bullet C did not match bullet A. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by Douglas Reiser
Homeowner A – 15/23 = ~65% Homeowner B – 5/23 = ~22% Homeowner C – 3/23 = ~13% Now, we take those percentages out of the bond proceeds and A recovers $7,800; B recovers $2,640.00 and C recovers $1,560.00. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:00 am by Drew Falkenstein
Death due to hep A is rare, but is more likely in patients with other liver diseases (like hep B or hep C). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Elliot Hinds
  This article represents our best understanding and interpretation based on where things currently stand. [1] You can find our more detailed summary of Title IV here. [2] CESA Section 4029. [3] Carriers and national security businesses will face a higher burden because they also have to show actual or expected losses that “jeopardize” their business under Section 4002(c)(2)(I). [4] CESA 4003(b)(4). [5] CESA Section 4003(c)(3)(D). [6] CESA Section… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
Note: offers and sales of securities made pursuant new Rule 506(c) would not be subject to the information disclosure requirements of Rule 502(b), because all of the purchasers in such an offering would be accredited investors. [read post]
The topics included: (a) preparation for a discussion with management about employees’ job performance and the employer’s staffing levels; (b) the right in a unionized workplace to union representation during an investigatory interview by the employer; (c) conduct by the employer (a sales event) that could have an impact on employees’ compensation (their sales commissions); and (d) the employer’s administration of income tax withholdings. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
(To that end, see our brief discussion in Section C. below, Possible Claims/Indications for Use). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
The strawman argument was so nice the judge repeated it twice: Section 230(c)(1) “does not insulate a company from liability for all conduct that happens to be transmitted through the internet. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
§1442(b), which bestows on federal officers a right to any action brought against them, regardless of the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by FDABlog HPM
” The Orange Book listing of one patent alleged to be a drug delivery device patent has already led one company to assert in court the patent delisting counterclaim provisions at FDC Act §505(c)(3)(D)(ii)(I) added to the statute by the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”) available to 505(b)(2) NDA sponsors. [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:58 am by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
  So, the regulatory framework should: (a) be international in nature (either by way of treaty or by way of relatively consistent adoption by a large number of States); (b) depend on State obligations as a means of regulating corporate behaviour; (c) be limited to the spyware field; (d) entail compulsory and concrete action on the part of States; (e) impose actual liabilities upon private entities developing spyware to undertake due diligence showing there is no real risk of… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:27 am by Neal S. Gainsberg
If a truck spills liquid on the road which causes Car A to hydroplane, and Car A hits Car B and Car C, and Car B and Car C get pushed into different lanes and THEY hit Cars D and E, now we have a chain-reaction accident – and multiple insurance companies all pointing the finger at one another so they can avoid paying out claims. [read post]