Search for: "English v. English" Results 6781 - 6800 of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
So, in relying on Neilson v Harford, (1841), 1 WPC 295, another English case concerning Neilson’s blast furnace, the Court explained that in Neilson “the claimed process included not only a law of nature but also several unconventional steps (such as inserting the receptacle, applying heat to the receptacle externally, and blowing the air into the furnace) that confined the claims to a particular, useful application of the principle. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am by INFORRM
His Holiness v Singh In 2007 His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj, an Indian ‘holy man’ from Panjab, brought libel proceedings for an article published in an English newspaper, headlined “Cult divides Sikh congregation in High Wycombe”. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis both expect that 3M’s latest lawsuit in Washington D.C. will fail, just as its prior two efforts failed in the New York court.3M Company v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
SCC 263.The Supreme Court is not bound by the dicta and authority of English cases.Chatturbhuj Vithaldas Jasani v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
  However, it was Seabrook who confronted zombies for the first time in an overt way in an English-language text. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Here is much of the opinion from an interesting libel case of his, Bustos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am by INFORRM
French, German and English media published the interviews along with photographs showing the child as well as Prince Albert. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:57 pm by Cyberleagle
  Neocleous v ReesThere continues to be judicial support for the Law Comm [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:07 am by Adam Wagner
Gaunt v OFCOM [2010] EWHC 1756 (QB) (13 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that OFCOM did not breach a DJ’s freedom of expression rights by finding that he  contravened the Broadcasting Code after calling a guest a “Nazi” during an interview on talkSPORT. [read post]