Search for: "In re T. W." Results 6781 - 6800 of 8,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
   If Tester-Hagen end up re-writing S. 510 too much, John Dingell, the longest serving member of the House who wrote the lower chamber's bill, may have problems with Senate concessions.Third, some observers think that while there maybe a solid Senate majority in favor of S. 510, it may be the very kind of bipartisan bill that Reid does not want chewing up precious floor time this close to the 2010 election. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Kelly
It doesn’t matter if you’re retired. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:16 am by Theo Francis
Antin, Senior VP Neil Tauber and Chief Financial Officer Thomas W. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
To paraphrase what the late great Professor David Gregory said: "[W]hat the state courts say is not the law. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:16 pm by Visae Patentes
Cir. 2010), " In Re Bonnstetter" (Fed. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
If there is to be free trade in services, don't we at least need some information about what constitutes genuine medical care? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm by David Zaring
  Here's the law and economics list: Richard Epstein Eric Posner Ian Ayres Steven Shavell Robert Cooter Louis Kaplow Thomas Ulen Christine Jolls Einer Elhauge George Priest W. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:20 pm
TOM GOLDSTEIN: Well, any time you have 90 decisions, and you have nine different justices, who aren't just in camps, you're going to get different results. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
“However Justice Stevens is going to come out on an issue, he is going to do it in a way that is very friendly and avuncular and good-natured,” Paul Clement, who was George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:39 am by William Carleton
Now, I know patent lawyers and Supreme Court observers won't take the Court's disavowal at face value. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm by Adam Thierer
They’re also why we haven’t had to resort to massive public subsidies for media, as many other nations have. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm by admin
  “We’re not going to sell anything at a loss or a fire sale,” said Fish. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
“ Footnote 19: “[T]hose portions of our opinions in State Street and AT&T relying solely on a “useful, concrete and tangible result” analysis should no longer be relied on. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Patently-O) CAFC: Deficient claim for priority can’t be fixed in a subsequent continuation: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]